A comparative study of psychotic and nonpsychotic stalking

A comparative analysis of psychotic versus nonpsychotic stalking is presented. Archival files of 25 forensic subjects whose alleged criminal offenses met a legal definition of stalking behavior were studied for demographic characteristics, stalking dynamics, psychosocial history, and current psychological variables. Although nearly one-third of all subjects had an Axis I psychotic disorder and were delusional, only one of these subjects had erotomanic delusions. The psychotic subjects' pursuit of victims was associated with other delusions and symptoms of psychosis. Nonpsychotic subjects tended to exhibit an Axis I disorder (usually major depression, adjustment disorder, or substance dependence) as well as a variety of Axis II personality disorders. The nonpsychotic subjects' pursuit of victims was influenced by various psychological factors, including anger and hostility, projection of blame, obsession, dependency, minimization and denial, and jealousy. Psychotic subjects visited the victims' homes significantly more often than nonpsychotic subjects. Nonpsychotic subjects made more verbal threats and "acted out" violently more often than psychotic subjects. While all subjects exhibited some similarities in stalking behaviors and demographic variables, including childhood attachment disruptions, no single profile of a "stalker" emerged. These findings provide information about factors contributing to stalking violence, as well as diagnostic issues that should be considered in the assessment and treatment of this criminal population.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. D. Glancy Commentary: Attacks on Royalty--The More We Know, The MoreWe Can Classify J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 68 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Dietz and P. Y. Martin Women Who Are Stalked: Questioning the Fear Standard Violence Against Women, July 1, 2007; 13(7): 750 - 776. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. E. Mullen, R. Mackenzie, J. R. P. Ogloff, M. Pathe, T. McEwan, and R. Purcell Assessing and Managing the Risks in the Stalking Situation J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 439 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Binder Commentary: The Importance of Professional Judgment in Evaluation of Stalking and Threatening Situations J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 451 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. McIVOR and E. PETCH Stalking of mental health professionals: an underrecognised problem The British Journal of Psychiatry, May 1, 2006; 188(5): 403 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Roberts Women's Experience of Violence During Stalking by Former Romantic Partners: Factors Predictive of Stalking Violence Violence Against Women, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 89 - 114. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Rosenfeld Violence Risk Factors in Stalking and Obsessional Harassment: A Review and Preliminary Meta-Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, February 1, 2004; 31(1): 9 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. P. Sheridan, E. Blaauw, and G. M. Davies Stalking: Knowns and Unknowns Trauma Violence Abuse, April 1, 2003; 4(2): 148 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. SPITZBERG The Tactical Topography of Stalking Victimization and Management Trauma Violence Abuse, October 1, 2002; 3(4): 261 - 288. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. B. Schlesinger Stalking, Homicide, and Catathymic Process: A Case Study Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, February 1, 2002; 46(1): 64 - 74. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. E. Mullen, M. Pathé, R. Purcell, and G. W. Stuart Study of Stalkers Am J Psychiatry, August 1, 1999; 156(8): 1244 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				B. H. SPITZBERG and J. RHEA Obsessive Relational Intrusion and Sexual Coercion Victimization J Interpers Violence, January 1, 1999; 14(1): 3 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]