Addressing bias in the forensic assessment of sexual harassment claims

This article addresses unique biases that arise in the assessment of sexual harassment claims by forensic psychiatrists. These include gender biases, diagnostic biases, sociopolitical biases, and bias that arises from lack of knowledge regarding sexual harassment or lack of formal psychiatric training. Forensic psychiatrists are ethically obligated to strive for objectivity and honesty in their assessments. By becoming aware of these biases and attempting to minimize them, we can meet our ethical obligations as forensic psychiatrists. In addition, we can provide more credible and valuable assessments to the courts in this increasingly litigated and partisan issue.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Wills The CHESS Method of Forensic Opinion Formulation: Striving to Checkmate Bias J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 535 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. Gold, S. A. Anfang, A. M. Drukteinis, J. L. Metzner, M. Price, B. W. Wall, L. Wylonis, and H. V. Zonana AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(Supplement_4): S3 - S50. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Goldyne Minimizing the Influence of Unconscious Bias in Evaluations: A Practical Guide J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]