Boundary violation ethics: some conceptual clarifications

The practices of both forensic psychiatry and clinical psychiatry appear to require and to use, in boundary-violation discourse, a special way of referring to the heightened attention to the ethics of interpersonal exchange. But this discourse and the judgments it expresses are each in need of closer scrutiny. A variety of factors make the determination of certain actions to be boundary violations unclear, including the range of alleged boundary-violating behavior, ambiguities in the fundamental metaphor of boundaries violated or transgressed, and confusion about the explanatory status of the value judgments boundary-violation language is used to express. In addition, disputes and disagreements regarding boundary-violation judgments require analysis--an analysis undertaken in this article through appeal to theories of professional role morality. Noted also is the significance of gender in boundary-violation ethics.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. R. Scofield What is medical ethics consultation? J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 95 - 118. [PDF]

				P. J. Candilis and R. Martinez Commentary: The Higher Standards of Aspirational Ethics J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2006; 34(2): 242 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Savin and R. Martinez Cross-cultural Boundary Dilemmas: A Graded-risk Assessment Approach. Transcultural Psychiatry, June 1, 2006; 43(2): 243 - 258. [Abstract] [PDF]