JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 30:4:476-482 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akinkunmi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akinkunmi, A.
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Fitness to Plead: a preliminary evaluation of a research instrument for assessing fitness to plead in England and Wales

AA Akinkunmi

This study concerns the preliminary evaluation of an instrument, the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Fitness to Plead (MacCAT-FP), for assessing competence to stand trial, according to the legal requirements in England and Wales. The purposes of the study were to ascertain whether the instrument can be administered practically to groups of prisoners, both those with mental illness and those without; to examine its internal consistency and interrater reliability; to determine whether it can distinguish between fit and unfit individuals, as judged by expert forensic psychiatrists; and to discover whether it is sensitive to changes over time. The instrument was administered to two groups of remanded prisoners: those transferred to psychiatric units for treatment and those without mental illness. In addition to the MacCAT-FP, scales measuring symptom severity and IQ were administered to all participants. Results suggest that the instrument is practical, with good internal consistency and interrater reliability. The correlation of scores with psychiatrists' opinions as to fitness was 0.77. Scores of unfit patients were significantly different from those of fit individuals. The instrument was able to detect significant differences in scores over time. It is suggested that once the instrument has been further validated for research purposes, it may be developed for clinical application.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Mossman
Conceptualizing and Characterizing Accuracy in Assessments of Competence to Stand Trial
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 340 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BRIEF TREAT CRISIS INTERVENHome page
D. Nussbaum, M. Hancock, I. Turner, J. Arrowood, and S. Melodick
Fitness/Competency to Stand Trial: A Conceptual Overview, Review of Existing Instruments, and Cross-Validation of the Nussbaum Fitness Questionnaire
Brief. Treat. Crisis Interven., February 1, 2008; 8(1): 43 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. D. Mackay
AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: An English Legal Perspective
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 501 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
A. A. Akinkunmi
Commentary: Competently Assessing Competence to Stand Trial Can Be Trying
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2006; 34(2): 189 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.