JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:1:99-105 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adshead, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adshead, G.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Evidence-Based Medicine and Medicine-Based Evidence: The Expert Witness in Cases of Factitious Disorder by Proxy

Gwen Adshead, MB, BS, MRCPsych, MA

Dr. Adshead is Consultant Psychotherapist, Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks, UK; Hon. Lecturer, St. George’s Hospital Medical School, London; and Hon. Research Fellow, University of Reading, Reading, UK. Address correspondence to: Gwen Adshead, MRCPsych, Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berks, UK RG45 7EG. E-mail: gwen.adshead{at}wlmht.nhs.uk

The UK media has recently devoted much attention to the role of expert witnesses in child protection cases. One or two particular pediatricians who have given expert testimony have been the subject of personal vilification and professional investigation. These cases raise questions about the use of medical expert testimony when there is real uncertainty in the scientific community and the emotional stakes are high. Do doctors use scientific evidence to make diagnoses in the same way that the courts use evidence to make judgments? The cases also raise questions about the personal credibility and trustworthiness of experts: should we allow ourselves to be seen as personally powerful witnesses? Are we responsible for how we are seen by the jury? In this article, these questions are addressed, with the conclusion that distress and anxiety about child maltreatment influences all the players in the justice process and may interfere with the process of justice.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
C. Bass and G. Adshead
Fabrication and induction of illness in children: the psychopathology of abuse
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2007; 13(3): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.