JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:3:342-349 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dike, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, E. E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dike, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, E. E. H.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Pathological Lying Revisited

Charles C. Dike, MD, MRCPsych, MPH, Madelon Baranoski, PhD and Ezra E. H. Griffith, MD

Dr. Dike and Dr. Baranoski are Assistant Clinical Professors, Law and Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, and Dr. Griffith is Professor of Psychiatry and African-American Studies, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Address correspondence to: Charles C. Dike, MD, MRCPsych, MPH, Connecticut Medical Health Center, Law and Psychiatry Division, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519. E-mail: charles.dike{at}yale.edu

Although pathological lying was first described in the medical literature over 100 years ago, it remains a poorly understood concept. Psychiatrists continue to grapple with the full ramifications of the condition, even though interest specifically in pathological lying seems to have waned in recent times. The impact of pathological lying deserves critical attention from forensic psychiatrists because of the implications that untruths have in a legal context. In this article, the authors review the considerable vagueness and confusion that has surrounded this concept and examine the extent to which a person can control lying behavior and the related question of whether pathological liars have responsibility for their actions. While providing a structured framework for considering pathological lying in the forensic context, the authors conclude that further systematic research is needed to resolve the questions raised in this article.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. L. Binder and D. E. McNiel
"He Said--She Said": The Role of the Forensic Evaluator in Determining Credibility of Plaintiffs Who Allege Sexual Exploitation and Boundary Violations
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2007; 35(2): 211 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat.Home page
C. Bass and G. Adshead
Fabrication and induction of illness in children: the psychopathology of abuse
Advan. Psychiatr. Treat., May 1, 2007; 13(3): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
C. Dike, M. Baranoski, and E. E. H. Griffith
What is pathological lying?
The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 189(1): 86 - 86.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
Y. Yang and A. Raine
Authors' reply
The British Journal of Psychiatry, July 1, 2006; 189(1): 86 - 86.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
C. C. Dike
Reply
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2006; 34(1): 132 - 133.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
B. Adetunji, B. Basil, K. Budur, and O. Oladinni
[In Process Citation]
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 131 - 132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Grubin
Commentary: Getting at the Truth about Pathological Lying
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2005; 33(3): 350 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.