JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:3:386-389 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norko, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norko, M. A.
ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Commentary: Compassion at the Core of Forensic Ethics

Michael A. Norko, MD

Dr. Norko is Deputy Editor, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law; Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Deputy Training Director, Forensic Residency, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; and Chief of Forensic Services, Whiting Forensic Division of Connecticut Valley Hospital, Middletown, CT. Address correspondence to: Michael A. Norko, MD, CMHC, Law and Psychiatry Division, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519. E-mail: michael.norko{at}yale.edu

In 1982, Dr. Alan Stone raised a central dilemma in ethics for forensic psychiatry that has prompted significant and important discussion of the concerns about twisting justice, prostituting the profession, and operating without adequate ethics guidelines in the course of our work. In presidential addresses to the membership of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL), Dr. Paul Appelbaum and Dr. Ezra Griffith have attempted to deal with Stone’s challenges, the former by providing a theory of forensic ethics, the latter by advocating cultural formulation and narrative as the methodology of our work. In his present contribution, Dr. Griffith advances the idea of narrative to involve compassion for the subject of the evaluation. In so doing, he brings us to a far more satisfactory resolution of the dilemma described by Dr. Stone. The obligation to show compassion deserves to be at the core of any valuable statement of forensic ethics. The role of compassion in justice, as discussed, for example, by Simone Weil, warrants further interdisciplinary study.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. M. Gellerman
[In Process Citation]
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 129 - 129.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.