JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33:3:394-400 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caplan, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caplan, A. L.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Too Hard to Face

Arthur L. Caplan, PhD

Dr. Caplan is The Emanuel and Robert Hart Professor of Bioethics and Chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Director, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Address correspondence to: Arthur L. Caplan, PhD, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320 Philadelphia, PA. 19104-3308. E-mail: caplan{at}mail.med.upenn.edu

While the Holocaust is often placed at the genesis of bioethics, this relatively young field has not yet seriously explored the conduct of German scientists and physicians involved in the human subjects experiments of the Holocaust. We comfort ourselves with the beliefs that the individuals involved in the events of the Holocaust were mad or evil and unlike other scientists and physicians. Yet the evidence is that these professionals were educated and capable members of a technologically sophisticated society who believed they were somehow behaving morally within the context of their social-political situation. The first defendants at Nuremberg were physicians and public health officials. An examination of the trial transcripts provides data about what motivated these medical scientists to engage in human experimentation and mass murder and the extent to which ethics rationales were given for unparalleled moral wrong-doing in biomedicine. Bioethics must still address these beliefs and subject them to close scrutiny.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
R. Blum, G. H. Stanton, S. Sagi, and E. D. Richter
'Ethnic cleansing' bleaches the atrocities of genocide
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 18(2): 204 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
S. Benedict, A. Caplan, and T. Lafrenz Page
Duty and 'Euthanasia': the Nurses of Meseritz-Obrawalde
Nursing Ethics, November 1, 2007; 14(6): 781 - 794.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.