JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:1:33-42 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gutheil, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gutheil, T. G.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Clinicians’ Perceptions of Boundaries in Brazil and the United States

Patrice Marie Miller, EdD, Michael Lamport Commons, PhD and Thomas G. Gutheil, MD

Dr. Miller is Research Associate, Dr. Commons is Assistant Clinical Professor, and Dr. Gutheil is Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. Dr. Miller is also Professor of Psychology, Salem State College, Salem, MA. Dr. Gutheil is also Co-Founder of the Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Address correspondence to: Michael Commons, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 234 Huron Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: commons{at}tiac.net

Although there has been considerable discussion of boundary excursions in clinician-patient relationships, little empirical research exists. This pilot study adds to the existing theoretical discussion by comparing perceptions by mental health professionals in Brazil and the United States of what may constitute boundary violations. Participants rated each possible boundary violation according to its degree of harm and professional unacceptability. Three distinct groupings of boundary violations were found: (1) core, consisting of the most serious violations; (2) separation of therapist and client lives, involving encounters between therapists and clients outside of therapy; and (3) disclosure and greeting behavior, involving disclosure of information about the therapist and greeting behavior. The U.S. and Brazilian perceptions were found to be surprisingly similar, with only a few differences.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.