J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:2:231-239 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Aggression Toward Forensic Evaluators: A Statewide Survey
Naomi Leavitt, PhD,
Helene Presskreischer, PsyD,
Patricia L. Maykuth, PhD and
Thomas Grisso, PhD
Dr. Leavitt is forensic psychologist with the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Forensic Division, Cambridge, MA. Dr. Presskreischer is forensic psychologist with the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Forensic Division, West Roxbury, MA. Dr. Maykuth is President of Research Design Associates, Decatur, GA. Dr. Grisso is Professor of Psychiatry (Clinical Psychology) and Program Coordinator of the Law and Psychiatry Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. The results of this survey were presented at the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, Forensic Division Conference, Tarrytown, NY, October 1999, and a forensic conference jointly sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health/Forensic Division and the University of Massachusetts Medical School Department of Psychiatry and Office of Continuing Education, Leominster, MA.
Address correspondence to: Naomi Leavitt, PhD, Cambridge Court Clinic, 40 Thorndike Street, Cambridge, MA 02141. E-mail: naomi.leavitt{at}dmh.state.ma.us
There is an increasing body of literature regarding violence toward mental health professionals in clinical settings, but little is known about the frequency of assaults on forensic evaluators. Forensic evaluators play a very different role in the evaluee's life than do treating clinicians. This study examined the incidence of aggressive behavior specifically directed toward forensic clinicians. Psychologists and psychiatrists (n = 190) in Massachusetts were surveyed regarding their experience of verbal threats, harassment/intimidation (H/I), and physical assault. Respondents were asked about the most distressing incident (MDI) in their forensic practices. This study found no more risk of aggressive behavior in the forensic context than the nonforensic context and concluded that forensic clinicians concerns about their safety may be somewhat misplaced. In the 76 reported MDIs, physical injury was minimal, yet emotional distress was pronounced. Training programs and work settings should validate the legitimacy of these reactions, and help clinicians to cope with their emotional reactions.
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.