HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Griffith, E. E. H. Articles by Bergeron, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Griffith, E. E. H. Articles by Bergeron, R. L.

Cultural Stereotypes Die Hard: The Case of Transracial Adoption

Dr. Griffith is Professor of Psychiatry and of African-American Studies, and Dr. Bergeron is Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Address correspondence to: Ezra E. H. Griffith, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, Suite 901, New Haven, CT 06511

Transracial adoption (commonly understood as the adoption of black children by white families) has been the subject of a persistent debate among adoption specialists, legal advocates, mental health professionals, and even civil rights advocates in this country for a long time. This has been so despite cumulative research evidence indicating that transracial adoptees can thrive and develop into confident adults with strong senses of identity and self-esteem. We contend that the evidence undergirding transracial adoption has not been effectively persuasive because of the tenacious and ubiquitous cultural belief that children and their potential adoptive parents should be matched along racial lines. However, the cultural principle of racial matching has also been diluted by judicial decisions that have narrowly allowed the use of race as one factor rather than as the controlling factor in adoption decisions. This article focuses on the use of a third element—federal statutory attempts intended to remove race as a controlling factor in child placement decisions. We will show how as a matter of public policy, the statutory efforts were meant to promote race-neutral approaches to adoption and to support transracial adoptions. However, in practice, the statutory attempts may still leave the door open to continued race-matching, which suggests that the cultural preference for race-matching in the construction of families remains powerfully ingrained and difficult to eradicate. As a consequence, transracial adoption appears to maintain its status as a culturally suspect phenomenon.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Bartholet Commentary: Cultural Stereotypes Can and Do Die: It's Time to Move on With Transracial Adoption J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2006; 34(3): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. H. Schetky Commentary: Transracial Adoption--Changing Trends and Attitudes J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2006; 34(3): 321 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]