JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:4:458-465 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, A.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Competency to Stand Trial and the Seriousness of the Charge

Alec Buchanan, PhD, MD

Dr. Buchanan is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Law and Psychiatry Division, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Address correspondence to: Alec Buchanan, PhD, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519. E-mail: alec.buchanan{at}yale.edu

Authorities disagree as to whether and how the mental capacity required for competence to stand trial should change as the charges against a defendant become more serious. Intuition and practice in other areas of law and psychiatry suggest that the mental capacity required should increase in these circumstances. The reasons relate to our belief that serious mistakes are more to be avoided and to a principle of "proportionality," according to which the threshold level of capacity required is derived, in part, from the consequences of a person’s being found competent. The article compares two approaches to "proportionality." The conclusions have implications for the wording of examiners’ conclusions and for the criteria by which patients are regarded as "restored to competence."




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
J. Ho, D. C. Ralston, L. B. McCullough, and J. H. Coverdale
When Should Psychiatrists Seek Criminal Prosecution of Assaultive Psychiatric Inpatients?
Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2009; 60(8): 1113 - 1117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Mossman
Conceptualizing and Characterizing Accuracy in Assessments of Competence to Stand Trial
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 340 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
A. Buchanan
Commentary: Facts and Values in Competency Assessment
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 352 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
T. Exworthy
Commentary: UK Perspective on Competency to Stand Trial
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 466 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.