JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 34:4:472-478 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janofsky, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janofsky, J. S.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Lies And Coercion: Why Psychiatrists Should Not Participate in Police and Intelligence Interrogations

Jeffrey S. Janofsky, MD

Dr. Janofsky is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Address correspondence to: Jeffrey S. Janofsky, MD, Meyer 4-181, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail: jjanofsky{at}jhu.edu

Police interrogators routinely use deceptive techniques to obtain confessions from criminal suspects. The United States Executive Branch has attempted to justify coercive interrogation techniques in which physical or mental pain and suffering may be used during intelligence interrogations of persons labeled unlawful combatants. It may be appropriate for law enforcement, military, or intelligence personnel who are not physicians to use such techniques. However, forensic psychiatry ethical practice requires honesty, striving for objectivity, and respect for persons. Deceptive and coercive interrogation techniques violate these moral values. When a psychiatrist directly uses, works with others who use, or trains others to use deceptive or coercive techniques to obtain information in police, military, or intelligence interrogations, the psychiatrist breaches basic principles of ethics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. R. Rappeport
Jeffrey S. Janofsky, MD: 34th President of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 13 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. Meyers

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 137 - 137.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. L. Young
Commentary: It's About the Fundamentals
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2006; 34(4): 479 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.