|
|
||||||||
SPECIAL ARTICLE |
Dr. Simon is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Director, Program in Psychiatry and Law, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Address correspondence to: Robert I. Simon, MD, 8008 Horseshoe Lane, Potomac, MD 20854-3831. E-mail: risimonmd{at}aol.com
Authorship in forensic psychiatry is a life-long commitment to learning, creativity, and professional growth. Forensic psychiatrists are writers, by choice and by necessity. The key concepts to effective writing in forensic psychiatry are "process" and a "workman-like approach." The process of writing is not a dash to the finish line, but is more akin to a leisurely, enjoyable walk. A workman-like approach to writing ensures that the author's writing is a process, not an event. Effective writing enhances clarity of communications with attorneys, judges, and others in the legal system. Writing with clarity and precision is a core competency in forensic psychiatry.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. E. H. Griffith Stone's Views of 25 Years Ago Have Now Shifted Incrementally J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 201 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Adetunji J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2007; 35(2): 276 - 276. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. H. Griffith and M. V. Baranoski Commentary: The Place of Performative Writing in Forensic Psychiatry J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 27 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Bloom Commentary: Authorship and Training in Forensic Psychiatry J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 32 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |