JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:2:200-210 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gold, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gold, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davidson, J. E.
REGULAR ARTICLE

Do You Understand Your Risk? Liability and Third-Party Evaluations in Civil Litigation

Liza H. Gold, MD and John E. Davidson, JD

Dr. Gold is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC. Mr. Davidson is Lecturer in Law, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA, and is in private practice at Davidson & Kitzmann, PLC, Charlottesville, VA. Address correspondence to: Liza H. Gold, MD, 2501 North Glebe Road, Suite 204, Arlington, VA 22207. E-mail: lhgoldmd{at}yahoo.com

Many psychiatrists believe that there is little or no liability associated with conducting examinations at the request of a third party or with providing testimony in civil litigation. Case law has demonstrated otherwise. Psychiatrists conducting independent medical examinations (IMEs) may be vulnerable to tort lawsuits by either the evaluee or the third party who commissions the IME. In addition, breaches of legal or ethical conduct can lead to disciplinary action by state medical boards and professional organizations. Although immunity for certain types of forensic activities is available, such immunity is qualified and may not be applicable to evaluations and related testimony conducted for third parties. Understanding the liability associated with third-party evaluations will assist psychiatrists in minimizing their exposure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
L. H. Gold, S. A. Anfang, A. M. Drukteinis, J. L. Metzner, M. Price, B. W. Wall, L. Wylonis, and H. V. Zonana
AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2008; 36(4 Suppl): S3 - S50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.