JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:3:317-322 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weisleder, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weisleder, P.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Inconsistency Among American States on the Age at Which Minors Can Consent to Substance Abuse Treatment

Pedro Weisleder, MD, PhD

Dr. Weisleder is Associate Professor of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, The Children's Medical Center of Dayton, Dayton, OH. Address correspondence to: Pedro Weisleder, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, The Children's Medical Center of Dayton, One Children's Plaza, Dayton, OH 45404-1815. E-mail: weislederp{at}childrensdayton.org

In a recent publication, the lack of consensus among U.S. laws regarding the age at which minors may consent to confidential treatment for abuse of illegal substances was highlighted. This article reports the results of an investigation of the information used by legislators to determine the age at which minors may consent to treatment. Evidence indicates that in four states lawmakers considered the advice of mental health professionals before making age determinations. In six states "consistency with other state laws" or "precedence" was the lawmakers' major consideration. In five states, the main concern was removing legal barriers to treatment access. Lawmakers from several states had no independent recollection regarding the motives behind age selection. When deciding on the age at which minors would be allowed to consent to substance abuse treatment, some state legislators based their decisions on clinical data or legal facts. Some, however, appear to have made decisions without a clear foundation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
P. Weisleder

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 428 - 428.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
K. B. Sullivan
A Public Policymaker's Response: Weisleder and Meyer on Legislator Decision-Making
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. J. Meyer
Commentary: Legislators How Did the Deciders Decide? Who Shall Serve as Their Experts?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2007; 35(3): 323 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.