JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:4:444-450 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Guillory, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Novak, B.
Right arrow Articles by Guillory, S.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Sex Offenders and Insanity: An Examination of 42 Individuals Found Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity

Brad Novak, MD, Barbara E. McDermott, PhD, Charles L. Scott, MD and Stacey Guillory, MA

Dr. Novak is on the Adjunct Clinical Faculty, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and is in private practice in forensic psychiatry in Belmont, CA. Dr. McDermott and Dr. Scott are Associate Professors, Department of Psychiatry, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA. At the time of the study, Ms. Guillory was research assistant to Dr. McDermott and Dr. Scott. Address correspondence to: Brad Novak, MD, 1301 Ralston Avenue, Building E, Suite C, Belmont, CA 94002. E-mail: novak.brad{at}gmail.com

Although currently there is a large body of research on the characteristics and treatment of sex offenders, very little research has been conducted to investigate the characteristics of sex offenders who have been adjudicated insane. This study included 42 patients at Napa State Hospital who were adjudicated not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) for a sex offense. The sample was further divided into offenders whose victims were children and those whose victims were adults. Data were collected with a structured chart review instrument. A large percentage of the sex offenders received a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, and many had a comorbid substance use disorder. The high percentage of sex offenders in the current study with diagnosed schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder may represent a previously unstudied subgroup of sex offenders. An alternative explanation is that the experts did not evaluate substance use and intoxication adequately, assess for malingering, or apply the proper legal standard for insanity.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
K. J. Weiss and C. Watson
NGRI and Megan's Law: No Exit?
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, March 1, 2008; 36(1): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. J. O'Shaughnessy
Commentary: Sex Offenders and Insanity
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2007; 35(4): 451 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.