JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:4:469-480 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourget, D.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehurst, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bourget, D.
Right arrow Articles by Whitehurst, L.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Amnesia and Crime

Dominique Bourget, MD and Laurie Whitehurst, PhD

Dr. Bourget is Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, and Part-time Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Ottawa, and Forensic Psychiatrist, Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Whitehurst is Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Address correspondence to: Dominique Bourget, MD, Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Z 7K4. E-mail: dbourget{at}rohcg.on.ca

Amnesia for serious offenses has important legal implications, particularly regarding its relevance in the contexts of competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility. Forensic psychiatrists and other mental health professionals are often required to provide expert testimony regarding amnesia in defendants. However, the diagnosis of amnesia presents a challenge, as claims of memory impairment may stem from organic disease, dissociative amnesia, amnesia due to a psychotic episode, or malingered amnesia. We review the theoretical, clinical, and legal perspectives on amnesia in relation to crime and present relevant cases that demonstrate several types of crime-related amnesia and their legal repercussions. Consideration of the presenting clinical features of crime-related amnesia may enable a fuller understanding of the different types of amnesia and assist clinicians in the medico-legal assessment and diagnosis of the claimed memory impairment. The development of a profile of aspects characteristic of crime-related amnesia would build toward establishing guidelines for the assessment of amnesia in legal contexts.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
H. S. Wortzel and D. B. Arciniegas
Amnesia and Crime: A Neuropsychiatric Response
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 218 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Bourget and L. Whitehurst
Commentary: A Response to Wortzel and Arciniegas About Amnesia and Crime
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 224 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.