JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:4:514-517 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gutheil, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gutheil, T. G.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Common Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Testamentary Capacity

Thomas G. Gutheil, MD

Dr. Gutheil is Professor of Psychiatry and Co-Founder, Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Address correspondence to: Thomas G. Gutheil, MD, 6 Wellman Street, Brookline MA 02446. E-mail: gutheiltg{at}cs.com

The examination for testamentary capacity poses several unique challenges to the forensic evaluator, especially when performed, as is often the case, postmortem. Forensic experience reveals that a series of common pitfalls awaits the unwary witness. This brief review identifies the more common pitfalls and suggests how to avoid them.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
A. A. Akinkunmi, S. P. Sarkar, H. J. Bursztajn, and M. W. Acklin
Re: too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, January 1, 2008; 36(1): 155 - 156.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.