JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:1:95-104 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leong, G. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leong, G. B.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Revisiting the Deific-Decree Doctrine in Washington State

Gregory B. Leong, MD

Dr. Leong is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, and Staff Psychiatrist, Center for Forensic Services, Western State Hospital, Tacoma, WA. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the University of Washington or the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. Address correspondence to: Gregory B. Leong, MD, Center for Forensic Services (PFECC-Ward C18), Western State Hospital, 9601 Steilacoom Boulevard SW, Tacoma, WA 98498-7213. E-mail: leonggb{at}dshs.wa.gov

The deific-decree exception to Washington's M'Naughten insanity standard first appeared in case law a quarter century ago in State v. Crenshaw. A few subsequent cases have attempted to refine the contours of the deific decree; however, the deific-decree doctrine has had only limited utility as a basis for the insanity defense. After about a decade of no activity in this area, the Washington courts have recently revisited the deific-decree doctrine in a case involving two defendants.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.