JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:2:218-223 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wortzel, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arciniegas, D. B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wortzel, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arciniegas, D. B.

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Amnesia and Crime: A Neuropsychiatric Response

Hal S. Wortzel, MD and David B. Arciniegas, MD

Dr. Wortzel is Instructor-Fellow, Veterans Integrated Service Network 19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (VISN 19 MIRECC), Denver Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, and the Neurobehavioral Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Arciniegas is Director of the Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Address correspondence to: Hal S. Wortzel, MD, Department of Psychiatry, CPH Room 2508, 4200 East 9th Avenue, C268-25, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail: hal.wortzel{at}uchsc.edu

Bourget and Whitehurst's "Amnesia and Crime," published in a prior issue of the Journal, addresses a conceptually complex and clinically challenging subject. Their treatment emphasizes psychiatric conditions in which memory disturbances may arise that are relevant to criminal proceedings. However, their consideration of the neurobiology of memory, memory disturbances, and the neurobiological bases of interactions between psychiatric symptoms and memory merit further elaboration. The relevance of memory impairment to criminal matters requires forensic psychiatric experts to possess a basic understanding of the phenomenology and neurobiology of memory. The present authors describe briefly the phenomenology and neuroanatomy of memory, emphasizing first that memory is not a unitary cognitive domain, clinically or neurobiologically. The assertion that psychotic delusions produce memory impairment is challenged, and the description of "organic" amnesia, both semantically and in terms of its clinical features, is reframed. Resources on which to build a neuropsychiatric foundation for forensic psychiatric opinions on memory impairment surrounding criminal behavior are offered.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. Bourget and L. Whitehurst
Commentary: A Response to Wortzel and Arciniegas About Amnesia and Crime
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 224 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.