HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Recupero, P. R. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Recupero, P. R.

Clinical Practice Guidelines as Learned Treatises: Understanding Their Use as Evidence in the Courtroom

Dr. Recupero is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and President/CEO, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI. This paper was presented at the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law's Annual Meeting, October 28, 2005, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Address correspondence to: Patricia R. Recupero, JD, MD, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Boulevard, Providence, RI 02906. E-mail: patricia_recupero{at}brown.edu

It is important for forensic experts to understand how clinical practice guidelines may enter the courtroom, what role they may play in a trial, and how they relate to expert testimony. Guidelines enter the record in several different ways and in several types of cases, typically with the assistance of an expert witness. A common vehicle for their introduction is the learned-treatise exception to the hearsay rule. Case law before and after Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. helps to elucidate the scrutiny that courts may direct toward medical texts proffered as evidence. This article discusses the implications of different rules and relevant case law for the forensic psychiatrist. The discussion notes important considerations for the expert witness, such as how guidelines may affect the expert's role, concerns about the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence, and questions about whether guidelines will be used for inculpatory or exculpatory purposes in medical malpractice trials.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Zonana Commentary: When Is a Practice Guideline Only a Guideline? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 302 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Kelly and G. Manguno-Mire Commentary: Helling v. Carey, Caveat Medicus J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 306 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]