JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:4:443-454 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by First, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Halon, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by First, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Halon, R. L.

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Use of DSM Paraphilia Diagnoses in Sexually Violent Predator Commitment Cases

Michael B. First, MD and Robert L. Halon, PhD

Dr. First is Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY. Dr. Halon is in private practice, San Luis Obispo, CA. Address correspondence to: Michael B. First, MD, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 60, New York, NY 10032. E-mail: mbf2{at}columbia.edu

There is legitimate concern in the psychiatric community about the constitutionality of sexually violent predator (SVP) commitment statutes. Such constitutionality depends on the requirement that a sexual offender have a mental abnormality that makes him commit violent predatory sex offenses and reflects almost exclusively a concern for public safety, with little regard for notions of clinical sensibility or diagnostic accuracy. However, given that mental health experts’ diagnostic opinions are, and will continue to be, important to the triers of fact in regard to the application of the SVP statutes, we describe valid means of making a DSM-IV-TR paraphilic diagnosis. We also provide a three-step approach for the judicious application of the diagnosis in the context of SVP commitment evaluations that emphasizes the importance of not making a paraphilia diagnosis based solely on the sexual offenses themselves. Finally, we discuss the appropriate use of a paraphilia NOS diagnosis in SVP cases.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. A. Prentky, A. I. Coward, and A. M. Gabriel
Commentary: Muddy Diagnostic Waters in the SVP Courtroom
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 455 - 458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
T. K. Zander
Commentary: Inventing Diagnosis for Civil Commitment of Rapists
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 459 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.