JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:4:470-481 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norko, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norko, M. A.

REGULAR ARTICLE

The Death Penalty in Catholic Teaching and Medicine: Intersections and Places for Dialogue

Michael A. Norko, MD

Dr. Norko is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, and Director of Forensic Services for the CT Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT. Address correspondence to: Michael A. Norko, MD, Law & Psychiatry Division, CMHC, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519. E-mail: michael.norko{at}yale.edu

Current debate on the death penalty in public and professional spheres is seen as divisive in nature, disallowing the possibility of common agreement. The history of views of the death penalty within the Catholic Church illustrates centuries of tensions and ambiguities as well as a current posture that manages to hold these tensions while advocating a strong position. That history of church views itself contains allusions to and intersections with medicine. There is something tangible to be gained in understanding religious views on the death penalty, in the debates both within medicine and in the public sphere. An argument is made for sufficient overlap of contemporary purpose between the goals of church and medicine to warrant further dialogue in enhanced and deliberative democratic processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. L. Young
Commentary: Further Points for Dialogue on the Death Penalty, the Church, and Our Profession
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 482 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. R. Ciccone and C. Clements
Commentary: The Cost of Converting Religious Morals Into Politics
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 485 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.