JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 36:4:491-498 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, J. R.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Functional MRI Lie Detection: Too Good to be True?

Joseph R. Simpson, MD, PhD

Dr. Simpson is Staff Psychiatrist, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, CA, and Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect any policy or position of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, the University of Southern California or the USC Keck School of Medicine. Address correspondence to: Joseph R. Simpson, MD, PhD, PO Box 15597, Long Beach, CA 90815. E-mail: jrsimpsonmd{at}earthlink.net

Neuroscientists are now applying a 21st-century tool to an age-old question: how can you tell when someone is lying? Relying on recently published research, two start-up companies have proposed to use a sophisticated brain-imaging technique, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to detect deception. The new approach promises significantly greater accuracy than the conventional polygraph—at least under carefully controlled laboratory conditions. But would it work in the real world? Despite some significant concerns about validity and reliability, fMRI lie detection may in fact be appropriate for certain applications. This new ability to peer inside someone's head raises significant questions of ethics. Commentators have already begun to weigh in on many of these questions. A wider dialogue within the medical, neuroscientific, and legal communities would be optimal in promoting the responsible use of this technology and preventing abuses.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
R. S. Fullam and M. C. Dolan
Authors' reply:
The British Journal of Psychiatry, September 1, 2009; 195(3): 270 - 271.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
N. K. Aggarwal
Neuroimaging, Culture, and Forensic Psychiatry
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2009; 37(2): 239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. R. Merikangas
Commentary: Functional MRI Lie Detection
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 499 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
D. D. Langleben and F. M. Dattilio
Commentary: The Future of Forensic Functional Brain Imaging
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 502 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.