JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 37:2:168-181 (2009)
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparr, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sparr, L. F.

REGULAR ARTICLE

Personality Disorders and Criminal Law: An International Perspective

Landy F. Sparr, MD, MA

Dr. Sparr is Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR. Address correspondence to: Landy F. Sparr, MD, Department of Psychiatry (OP02), Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239. E-mail: sparrl{at}ohsu.edu

At the International War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), a detention camp guard, charged with acts of murder and torture, advanced a plea of diminished responsibility. Defense psychiatrists testified that he had a personality disorder that influenced his ability to control his behavior, but a prosecution expert testified that the guard did not meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Thus, the unresolved question of how the law defines a mental disease or defect for purposes of mitigation or excuse was transposed to an international setting. It has been argued in a variety of jurisdictions and national legal systems that exculpatory mental disorders must be serious, and personality disorders should not qualify. In fact, it has been proposed that the volitional aspect of excuse defenses be eliminated, and definitions of mental disease or defect narrowed. Others have argued that such exclusions are too restrictive and arbitrary. This article examines the criminal defense at ICTY and traces its origin in national jurisdictions. Mental incapacity defenses based on personality disorders are more often used in The Netherlands, England, Germany and Belgium, but seldom in Canada and rarely in the United States and Sweden.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
R. Slovenko
Commentary: Personality Disorders and Criminal Law
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2009; 37(2): 182 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
J. A. Baird and C. Rodgers
Commentary: Personality Disorder and Diminished Responsibility--The Significance of Priorities and Objectives
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, June 1, 2009; 37(2): 186 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.