JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 37:3:363-370 (2009)
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spirito, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garvey, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Spirito, A.
REGULAR ARTICLE

Contracting for Safety With Patients: Clinical Practice and Forensic Implications

Keelin A. Garvey, MD, Joseph V. Penn, MD, Angela L. Campbell, JD, Christianne Esposito-Smythers, PhD and Anthony Spirito, PhD

Dr. Garvey is Fellow in forensic psychiatry, University of California Davis. Dr. Esposito-Smythers is Adjunct Assistant Professor, and Dr. Spirito is Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI. Dr. Penn is Director, Mental Health Services, Correctional Managed Care, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), Huntsville, TX. Ms. Campbell is Managing Member, Dickey & Campbell Law Firm, PLC, and Adjunct Professor, Drake Law School, Des Moines, IA. Address correspondence to: Keelin A. Garvey, MD, University of California Davis Medical Center, Division of Psychiatry and the Law, 2230 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail: keelin_garvey{at}ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

The contract for safety is a procedure used in the management of suicidal patients and has significant patient care, risk management, and medicolegal implications. We conducted a literature review to assess empirical support for this procedure and reviewed legal cases in which this practice was employed, to examine its effect on outcome. Studies obtained from a PubMed search were reviewed and consisted mainly of opinion-based surveys of clinicians and patients and retrospective reviews. Overall, empirically based evidence to support the use of the contract for safety in any population is very limited, particularly in adolescent populations. A legal review revealed that contracting for safety is never enough to protect against legal liability and may lead to adverse consequences for the clinician and the patient. Contracts should be considered for use only in patients who are deemed capable of giving informed consent and, even in these circumstances, should be used with caution. A contract should never replace a thorough assessment of a patient's suicide risk factors. Further empirical research is needed to determine whether contracting for safety merits consideration as a future component of the suicide risk assessment.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.