JAAPL
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 37:4:509-524 (2009)
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phenix, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sreenivasan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phenix, A.
Right arrow Articles by Sreenivasan, S.
REGULAR ARTICLE

A Practical Guide for the Evaluation of Sexual Recidivism Risk in Mentally Retarded Sex Offenders

Amy Phenix, PhD and Shoba Sreenivasan, PhD

Dr. Phenix is in Private Practice in Pullman, WA. Dr. Sreenivasan is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and the Behavioral Sciences, Keck School, University of Southern California, and the Director of Forensic Outreach Services, GLA VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. Address correspondence to: Amy Phenix, PhD, PMB 242, 630 Quintana Road, Morro Bay, CA 93442. E-mail: amy{at}amyphenix.com

Although sex offender risk assessment has progressed greatly over the past decade and a half since most states implemented the sexually violent predator/sexually dangerous person (SVP/SDP) laws, there continues to be limited applicability of such models to intellectually disabled sex offenders because there has been no empirical validation. However, SVP/SDP civil commitment programs have reported increased admission of developmentally disabled sex offenders. Differentiating sexual deviance, the primary factor predisposing most individuals to criminal sexual violence, from impulsive, immature, and inappropriate behavior stemming from cognitive deficits presents yet another challenge to the clinician tasked with performing such evaluations. This article reviews actuarial risk models and their limited applicability to mentally retarded sex offenders and offers a conceptual method of assessing the risk of recidivism in intellectually disabled sex offenders under SVP/SDP evaluation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
G. D. Glancy and M. Saini
The Confluence of Evidence-Based Practice and Daubert Within the Fields of Forensic Psychiatry and the Law
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, December 1, 2009; 37(4): 438 - 441.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.